A happy boy. I worked on this paper for too long and i’ve had to cut an awful lot. I will turn my paper in. The pagential breakdown reads as follows
4 pages devoted to describing NET criteria
8 pages devoted to evaluating Nietzsche’s position on morality and building a NET out of Nietzsche’s work.
3 pages of synthetic analysis concluding that morality cannot be arbitrary nor can it be stagnant.

8 sources ranging from hardcore philosophical works like Hegel’s Logic, where i derive the use of the Hegelian Dialectic and the influences of Kant on Hegel’s dialectical method, to the bible. Yes folks i quoted the bible.. What paper on morality is complete without actually bringing the bible out and poking fun at it? if it is an ethical paper, this is simply necessary.

Trey, thanks for looking over my paper and marking it red like a beeotch… didn’t know my gramatical skills had fallen so far down, althought i’m positive you guys knew. You read my blogs every day and realize, “this guy is a grammatical moron…” oh well. thanks again Trey.

LIFE FEEDS ON LIFE! FEEDS ON LIFE! FEEDS ON LIFE! FEEDS ON LIFE!

sorry little tool snuck in my head… i’m in a strange mood today…

I need to study for both of my finals that are tomorrow, but they are history and anthropology…. i can do those backwards and forwards and even in my sleep.. did i mention i feel like a god? i wonder if i can stop a bus with my mere hands… leap tall buildings… fly perhaps? need to go and check to see if my innate super powers have perhaps kicked in…

hmm i’m done.. hope everyone is having a good day…